Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius to Mueller (who opposed investigation of Saudi 9/11): Check Saudi connections/influence!

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Saturday, September 02, 2017

Mrs. May and BBC feed compulsory fee paying English people with Saudi sharia, boring and useless cricket* and racist EU and China hate speech, while football, EU and China are way more popular.

* Klevius has been told that BBC deliberately tries to boost cricket propaganda while suppressing football etc. As a result English compulsory license fee payers are force fed with cricket in every possible and impossible part of BBC's news and other broadcastings by BBC. The situation is already laughable - but for how long will it be tolerated by the people? And was the horrifying crossbow incident last week a lunatic's response to this strange media propaganda? We've heard about attacks on football matches but never when it comes to cricket before. Who sane person could possibly be excited by cricket anyway - a "sport" that compared to football is like ice compared to steam. Or like comparing islamist countries with Atheist countries like China and Japan.

Is Mrs May digging a miserable "British" sharia caliphate grave under the Brexit cliff?

England is now almost totally  dependent on its service sector - a sector that is robotized faster than the manufacturing sector ever was.

Is the laundering of dirty sharia blood money what England will be relying on after Brexit?

However, China is now not only leading robotization but also has the fastest future growth safeguarded today.

Top (industrial)robot companies in the world – robot install base worldwide

    Fanuc (Japan) – 400,000.
    Yaskawa (Japan) – 300,000.
    ABB (Sweden/Switzerland) – 300,000.
    Kawasaki (Japan) – 110,000.
    Nachi (Japan) – 100,000.
    Kuka (China) – 80,000.
    Denso (Japan) – 80,000.
    Mitsubishi (Japan) – 70,000.
    Epson (Japan) – 55,000
    Stäubli (Switzerland) – 45,000
    Foxconn (Taiwan) – 40,000
    Comau (Italy) – 30,000
    Omron/Adept (Japan) – 25,000

While Theresa May threatens to kill hundreds of thousands with nuke strikes China builds a better world for itself and others. Just as Japan did after WW2.

England could benefit a lot by cooperating with China. China also loves football - you know, the game England invented. However, Mrs May prefers Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and cricket. "Sharia is good for the Brits". But Klevius wonders: Who are the "Brits"? British National Party or Muslim Sharia Council of Britain? Or perhaps May, Fox and Davies?

Mrs May, Mr Fox and Mr Davies want to sell Saudi islamofascist hate mongering as "British security competence" to EU.

The Great Wall of China has opened its gates - while Mrs May bows before the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

And BBC continues to miss the open goal, i.e. that out of the two islamic theocracies Iran and Saudi Arabia, one is democratic and the other is a full blown dictatorship. Just as they have missed that Saudi supported Bahrain has a huge shia majority with no democratic say whatsoever. BBC seems to compete hard for being the world's most faked, bigoted and hypocritical media company.

Theresa May dislikes Human Rights because they are against sharia - except when she criticizes China of course.

No comments: